U.N. Madness and Foreign Uncertainty

9/24/09 WTTK Curtis Sliwa with J KT McFarland discussing the U.N. and Foreign uncertainty.

AUTOMATICALLY GENERATED TRANSCRIPT
(may not be 100% accurate)

” Curtis Sliwa is online. This — Curtis week nights from 10 PM to one Leo. Spent. It’s in this morning’s news daily news tabloid says it all ladies and gentleman here in New York. Mad man. Another circus at the UN it’s a crazy — the heckling jackal of the United Nations take to the podium to sprout the — are vitriol. In one colonial have not made any job I’m in the mood for Jihad the president of Iran. But more importantly you have wacky kidnapped its first appearance. Since he took control of Libya forty years ago. He has this — skull cap on his head. And after deciding to speak. Roll over and now even though he only was a lot of fifteen minutes you’ll look at him in all of his movements in music you know. If embattled New York governor Democrat David Paterson had that — skullcap — said. He would look just like he’s — and absolutely incredible. But David Paterson on his worst day would not say that crazy bizarre thing support from the lips. A wacky kidnapping — nation of Islam — for its abilities and lackeys hanging on every word. With school Louis park on as his host. On this occasion. But somebody who. To deal with kidnapping at the height of his power. Is KT McFarland. Who’s a pentagon official during the Reagan administration. And KTF thanks for joining us once again pleasure. So this is like flashback. You’re watching kidnapping so many years after yeah Ronald Reagan shut him down and shut him up. When he launched the jets. It took out his tenth at the time. And obviously part of his entourage while we are observations watching hand him up on that — international stage of the UN General Assembly.”

” Well a couple of things one I think it’s always great when dictators can Americans start talking because the rest of the world sees some firm not the kind of crazy people they are. I’m operative and chatting capacity integrate examples this thing now it’s Gaddafi and the tennis serve to read reinvention said he hasn’t himself. In the Reagan administration he was somebody who was blustering around the price of oil was — the beginning of the Reagan administration. He was on the rise. And then. We’ve leveled him. Now — to come back. And Qaddafi — strong tough guy — can — point where he saw the pictures flashed on the screen. His — Saddam Hussein getting pulled out of a rap hall. Without just picking through his beard looking for headlines at which point Qaddafi who had a nuclear prior Graham who is an active supporters of terrorism. He immediately within a week — same — concluded our next step and he drafted nuclear program he offered concessions. And payments to the victims of Lockerbie he sang it very different — and now what we saw yesterday. That the UN was a Qaddafi back on the right. Back tapping to apologize to any — this is a Qaddafi who got remember the terrorists in charge of Lockerbie was just released to Qaddafi. And so I think what we’re saying is that reemerge — Chad again as strong man to asking who we think it’s crazy bet crazy like a fox.”

” Now KT McFarland we see. Full public consumption. That the State Department and the president of the United States Barack Obama apparently have dismissed six separate requests. By the prime minister of the UK brown to have some kind of in formal formal meeting while he’s here for this General Assembly presentation. Things like this. — they done in advance with both sides giving a wink and a nod clearly Barack Obama wants to show him tough. We don’t like what the UK — releasing the terrorist into the hands of Qaddafi for sweetheart deal on natural gas and oil reserves. What do you think this is truly genuine.”

” I think to the United States was either caught by surprise in terribly embarrassed by hand. Or the United States did have a — and — not an advance I haven’t I think it’s the former I think they’re dead brown and the British. Went ahead and did this release of the prisoner of a lack of being. Amber terrorists. And and hopes of getting it out as you point out concessions over on — can’t and I don’t think they’ve figured it would be such world follow up as a result.”

” I think it’s a certain extent. Either them about administration knew about it and is now covering his tracks are looking — what Britain.”

” Or it didn’t know about it and it’s ticked off about it I mean this — some payments. — Britain didn’t have to do they do — are very obvious reasons which is to get to sweetheart deals on campus.”

” And oil and there’s a lot of evidence that the brits know exactly what they’re doing.”

” Now while all this is transpiring on the international stage of the general assembly of the United Nations. The march of the totalitarian. Dictators. The president is basically. Talking through surrogates. About a new policy for Afghanistan. And his most recent version of this policy in defiance of what his own generals are requesting — him. Is to save any siding with apparently vice president Joe Biden’s idea. That we have less troops in Afghanistan. And that — city they have been more pointed in the direction. As a strike force of going in and extricating al-Qaeda operatives Taliban operatives in both Afghanistan and in Pakistan. Why would the president be going with that as a potential option.”

” Score that temptation I mean he’s its. Obama is now at the verge of doing to Afghanistan frankly what Rumsfeld did to Iraq which is they have just enough troops. Compared to stave off defeat but not enough to prevail and my worry is that Obama and the next week — he’s got to make a decision soon about — the crest general crystal reports. Which. Didn’t the initial report which I recommend everybody read it’s in plain English and it’s brutally realistic about the situation in Afghanistan. And the crystal says without more troops and a different strategy we lose. So bonds got a state that decision in the next couple of days does indeed put in more troops. Where does he not knowing full well that she doesn’t we will probably loses and I worry is that instead of putting more troops into what he’s got to do to prevail or. Getting out — He’s gonna have this flow believed where we lose American lives so we don’t ever win and we don’t quite loses and and nothing gets resolved — just that we’re. We can’t — it and can’t get out. And that that’s my concern is that he won’t have access to do either on.”

” Well we know we already have drones flying all over those west in — yeah provinces of Pakistan looking for targets of al-Qaeda entirely — We know that we probably have CIA operatives on the ground to give us better. Would this mean troops being sent in for instance the very similar to what we saw. When that as special brigade went in to extricate a leader of the al-Qaeda in Somalia.”

” You know I think that nobody’s talking about putting chips on the ground boots on the ground in Pakistan. What Biden and others are talking about is getting out of Afghanistan. And leaving a residual very small forward maybe — trading at training forests training Afghans. And then operates the drums out of air bases in and into Afghanistan to attack in Pakistan. The one good bit at noon in the Afghan war which has been gone I’m very badly in the last couple of months that they — distance. Is that drowned when I was in Afghanistan — He would hear them leader every morning at about 4 in the morning to go search and destroy it over Pakistan that two rounds have taken out. Probably as good stirred up behind leadership. And al-Qaeda and the Taliban and and all of those people been replaced. Anybody takes that job has to realize I’m targeted because what the drones do that he’s their big birds of prey. They can track the terrorists we want to get information about somebody as strong as can just — follow him around for days. And tell restrictions — about them again.”

” Now. The president’s strategy. Dropping like a hot rock our number one allies in East Europe Poland and the Czech Republic over the nuclear missile shield. That ten interceptor missiles that would have been put on polish oil and the radar equipment that would have been put on the Czech Republic. Soil. The justification of that seems to be coming from issuing gathering of the General Assembly because in this morning’s old gray lady in the New York Times. The lead story is is that Obama is back on Iran and arms curbs rusher and China will help. Was this the quid pro coal we eliminates. Nuclear missile shield in Poland and Czech Republic and you pool and have got to step up and no longer give cover and support for Iran.”

” Well I hope so because if we canceled that missile shield — that and on the Czech Republic and got nothing for a and we really did just give up whenever aces in the hall and and you know in exchange for — The Russians are the only ones who can help us with Iran and stopping Iran’s nuclear program. And if that Russians cooperate with us we have a chance that the Russians don’t cooperate there’s really no chance. It’s not clear it haven’t they are for your friendship. It’s not clear to me that the Russians really cap come along with that over the week over last weekend.”

” The Russian president and — to have he gave — he gave an interview where he — quite like they were gonna go along with sanctions.”

” Put said the same thing last week they have a statement in the New York Times basis so what they’ve reversed themselves. I don’t — only time will tell if the Russians cooperate with us. And staff in Iran’s nuclear program at a take good thing for the United States if however we have given up.”

” This behold the polish and Czech Republic missile shield.”

” And got nothing for a well I think that’s not — it’s in its its or certainly won’t have earned their chance.”

” Listen to Curtis nights from pentium to what — else thought Boston. Called revolution might — six on WTKK.”